The general election is testing Japan's pacifist principles, with some conservative parties pushing to review them to better respond to the changing security landscape.
Depending on the outcome of Sunday's House of Representatives election, Japan may see an intensified debate on reviewing the country's non-nuclear principles.
Under the government of Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi, a security hawk who took office in October, Japan is expected to update key defense and security documents in the face of an assertive China, a nuclear power, as well as the North Korean missile and nuclear threats.
The Japan Innovation Party, which formed a coalition with Takaichi's Liberal Democratic Party in October, has called for a debate on the possibility of nuclear sharing with the United States.
The conservative party is advocating the sharing of nuclear-powered submarines with the United States, stressing the need to deepen the security alliance under which Japan has long been protected by the U.S. nuclear umbrella.
Japan has maintained its three non-nuclear principles since 1967, prohibiting the possession, production or introduction of nuclear weapons on its territory.
That stance is deeply rooted in the country, the only nation to have been attacked with nuclear weapons.
While Takaichi has said her government upholds the principles, she has not ruled out a review in the future. "I refrain from comment as work is still under way" on revising the key security and defense documents, she said.
When Japan adopted its current national security strategy in 2022, Takaichi, then minister in charge of economic security, called for the removal of language stating that Japan upholds the three non-nuclear principles as it could undermine the effectiveness of the U.S. nuclear umbrella.
Major political parties are divided over whether the principles need to be changed.
"We will uphold the non-nuclear principles. We will build a country that will never wage a war or get involved in one," Yoshihiko Noda, co-leader of the newly formed Centrist Reform Alliance told a crowd in a stump speech.
Fellow co-leader Tetsuo Saito, a lawmaker elected from Hiroshima, devastated by a U.S. atomic bombing in 1945, has also stressed the importance of the principles in pushing for a world free of nuclear weapons.
The opposition Democratic Party for the People, Japanese Communist Party and Reiwa Shinsengumi are also in favor of retaining the principles.
The tense security environment surrounding Japan has prompted calls, especially from conservative quarters, for the country's defense capabilities to be bolstered.
Before the election, Defense Minister Shinjiro Koizumi hinted at the possibility of Japan acquiring nuclear-powered submarines, a major change in a country where the use of nuclear power for military purposes has long been taboo.
The LDP's election platform pledges to "fundamentally" strengthen Japan's defense forces, with no mention of such submarines.
"We should not treat nuclear-related issues as taboo and discuss them," said Sohei Kamiya, head of the ultraconservative populist Sanseito party.
A recent Kyodo News poll points to expanding voter support for the LDP, with the ruling coalition likely to secure more than a majority of the 465 lower house seats.
Survivors of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki are closely watching where the country is heading, worried that Japan's pacifist foundation is under threat.
Yuka Miyazaki, a 19-year-old university student whose great-grandmother survived an atomic bombing, said she feels uneasy when politicians do not talk about nuclear issues in their stump speeches.
A student of international relations who conducts interviews with atomic bomb survivors, known as hibakusha, Miyazaki said, "The issue of nuclear weapons is taken up solely in the context of security. For me, it is also an issue of ethics and humanity, so it's different."
© KYODO
6 Comments
Login to comment
sakurasuki
Another way to see it after military in Japan unable to boost recruitment, will there any conscription in the future? Which the only way to boost recruitment.
https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2025/08/31/japan/japan-struggle-boost-troops/
obladi
Revising the constitution should be done when things are stable. Right now, with political parties going bonkers, the last thing we need are more nukes.
masugomi
The article pretends Japan is going to become an aggressor state. Nonsense.
Geeter Mckluskie
A commitment to investing in advanced technologies...and a nuclear deterrent would vastly reduce the need for conscription.
Mr Kipling
The general election is testing Japan's pacifist principles, with some conservative parties pushing to review them to better respond to the wishes of the US administration.
Longhaul
Conscription" is a lazy 1940s fantasy. It’s not happening in 2026.
Illegal: Article 18 of the Constitution bans "involuntary servitude." Forcing a draft isn't a policy change; it’s a legal suicide mission.
Obsolete: Japan’s ¥9T budget is for AI, drone swarms, and SHIELD tech. You don't need a draft to run a high-tech automated defense.
Economic Ruin: With zero labor surplus, yanking young people out of the workforce would collapse the economy and the pension system overnight.
Japan is choosing Silicon over Soldiers. Suggesting a draft just proves you don't understand the law, the tech, or the math.